AutoDock Models for the StarDrop Pose Generation Interface (PGI)
From the manuscript “DOCKSTRING: Easy Molecular Docking Yields Better Benchmarks for Ligand Design”, Miguel García-Ortegón, Sergio Bacallado, et al¹ have developed…
From the manuscript “DOCKSTRING: Easy Molecular Docking Yields Better Benchmarks for Ligand Design”, Miguel García-Ortegón, Sergio Bacallado, et al¹ have developed…
This worked example uses StarDrop’s Surflex eSim3D module to assess a small library of compounds for their similarity to known Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) ligands. ideo archive.
In this example, we will use the Sensitivity Analysis tool in StarDrop’s MPO Explorer module to check if the ranking of compounds in a data set is sensitive to any of the criteria or importance values in a scoring profile.
In this example we will use the Profile Builder in StarDrop’s MPO Explorer module to derive a multi-parameter scoring profile, based on a CNS data set.
This SeeSAR and ADME QSAR worked example uses a combination of 2D and 3D methods to understand and optimise a virtual library of Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors.
We present results on the extent to which physics-based simulation (exemplified by FEP+) and focused machine learning (exemplified by QuanSA) are complementary for ligand affinity prediction.
In this webinar, we demonstrate how Augmented Chemistry®, a unique deep learning method, can learn from higher throughput data together with limited panel data to provide high-quality imputations for sensory properties.
Innovative predictive methods support virtual screening and compound design in the absence of 3D structure data.
To better understand conformational propensities, global strain energies were estimated for 156 protein-macrocyclic peptide cocrystal structures.
We report a new method for X-ray density ligand fitting and refinement that is suitable for a wide variety of small-molecule ligands, including macrocycles.
Using the DUD-E+ benchmark, we explore the impact of using a single protein pocket or ligand for virtual screening compared with using ensembles of alternative pockets, ligands, and sets thereof.
We introduce a new method for rapid computation of 3D molecular similarity that combines electrostatic field comparison with comparison of molecular surface-shape and directional hydrogen-bonding preferences (called “eSim”).
ForceGen is both faster and more accurate than the best of all tested methods on a very large, independently curated benchmark of 2859 PDB ligands. In this study, the primary results are on macrocycles, including results for 431 unique examples from four separate benchmarks.
We introduce the QuanSA method for inducing physically meaningful field-based models of ligand binding pockets based on structure-activity data alone.
We introduce the ForceGen method for 3D structure generation and conformer elaboration of drug-like small molecules.
Surflex-QMOD integrates chemical structure and activity data to produce physically-realistic models for binding affinity prediction.
We present an approach that uses structural information known prior to a particular cutoff-date to make predictions on ligands whose bounds structures were determined later. The knowledge-guided docking protocol was tested on a set of ten protein targets using a total of 949 ligands.
Here we present an analysis of novel drug/target predictions, focusing on those that were not obvious based on known pharmacological crosstalk.
We present a hybrid structure-guided strategy that combines molecular similarity, docking, and multiple-instance learning such that information from protein structures can be used to inform models of structure–activity relationships.