How does Optibrium protect customer data?
The age of data The internet has transformed the way the world does business. As hardware and software have evolved,…
Abstract
Computational approaches for binding affinity prediction are most frequently demonstrated through cross-validation within a series of molecules or through performance shown on a blinded test set. Here, we show how such a system performs in an iterative, temporal lead optimisation exercise. A series of gyrase inhibitors with known synthetic order formed the set of molecules that could be selected for “synthesis.” Beginning with a small number of molecules, based only on structures and activities, a model was constructed. Compound selection was done computationally, each time making five selections based on confident predictions of high activity and five selections based on a quantitative measure of three-dimensional structural novelty. Compound selection was followed by model refinement using the new data. Iterative computational candidate selection produced rapid improvements in selected compound activity, and incorporation of explicitly novel compounds uncovered much more diverse active inhibitors than strategies lacking active novelty selection.
More publications to browse
Open-source drug discovery software: It’s free, right?
When are open-source drug discovery solutions a good fit? We should first clarify that when we’re speaking about open-source tools,…
Machine Learning 101: How to optimise hyperparameters
What are parameters in machine learning models? The regular (non-hyper) parameters of an ML model are the numbers that it…
