Abstract
Computational approaches for binding affinity prediction are most frequently demonstrated through cross-validation within a series of molecules or through performance shown on a blinded test set. Here, we show how such a system performs in an iterative, temporal lead optimisation exercise. A series of gyrase inhibitors with known synthetic order formed the set of molecules that could be selected for “synthesis.” Beginning with a small number of molecules, based only on structures and activities, a model was constructed. Compound selection was done computationally, each time making five selections based on confident predictions of high activity and five selections based on a quantitative measure of three-dimensional structural novelty. Compound selection was followed by model refinement using the new data. Iterative computational candidate selection produced rapid improvements in selected compound activity, and incorporation of explicitly novel compounds uncovered much more diverse active inhibitors than strategies lacking active novelty selection.
More publications to browse
Finding the breakthrough compounds hiding in chemical space
Download the guide and learn what generative chemistry is, where it fits in the discovery workflow, and best practices to avoid common pitfalls.
How can I predict binding affinity without a target protein structure?
Why traditional ligand-based QSAR methods have fallen short You might be sceptical about ligand-based QSAR approaches; many researchers are. We discussed why there has…
